But as we’ve seen before, the kit lens is really letting the side down here, delivering a disappointingly soft result in some areas, particular in the third row, taken from the lower right corner. This is particularly apparent in the final row of crops.Īs for the Canon 450D / XSi, its default image processing (like most DSLRs) is more restrained than even an enthusiast’s compact, so side by side, its results look relatively flat. Punchier image processing by default is undoubtedly a factor in the G9’s crisper output, but it also has a sharp lens which, with its two extra Megapixels, is definitely resolving visibly greater detail overall. The LX3’s crops do however look slightly dull compared to the Canon G9, and there’s also optical softness in the crop of the mountain ridge from the top left corner. That’s certainly been a wise decision here as in the first row of crops, the Canon G9’s brighter exposure has resulted in blown highlights. The crops are taken from the upper left, center, lower right and lower left portions of the originals and presented here at 100%.įirst things first: as you’ll see here and on our Gallery page, the Lumix LX3 tends to err on underexposure, presumably to protect highlight areas from saturation. The image left was taken with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 at 7mm f4 and with a sensitivity of 80 ISO the original JPEG measured 4.19MB. The lenses on each camera were adjusted to deliver the same vertical field of view. To compare real-life performance we shot the same scene with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3, Canon PowerShot G9 and Canon EOS 450D / XSi within a few moments of each other using their Program modes, best quality JPEG and lowest ISO settings. Support this site by price checking below Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / High ISO Noise Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 results continued… Now let’s look at the Lumix LX3’s resolution in a studio environment. As always, you may also achieve better results with alternative RAW development software. Some tweaking will definitely be required, but it’s worth it if you want to get the best from the LX3. ![]() Silkypix, like most RAW developers, offers a broad range of adjustments though, and it’s possible to match the in-camera JPEG style or improve on it. The RAW file processed in Silkypix with the default settings is much more refrained and appears fuzzy in comparison. The two samples below show significantly different approaches to image processing. ![]() Below are 100% crops taken from the original JPEG file alongside the RAW version, processed with the supplied Silkypix Developer Studio 3.0SE software using its default settings. We photographed the scene here in the Lumix LX3’s RAW plus Fine JPEG mode, allowing us to directly compare images created from exactly the same data. Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 results : Outdoor resolution / Studio resolution / High ISO Noise
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |